Abandoned Codex

[Gareth]

[casik]

i think that if people had houses on the island then people would stay on island rather than being on the mainland and also if you could add in people being able to spend gold/qps on buying like a guard dog or a personal servant or maybe even a healer that would make the game much more attractive. also i think the game should be more roleplay friendly like if you kill a snake and get a arm its like cause snakes dont have arms unless otherwise noted in the description.

[Gareth]

[neq]

being able to brew something with more than one spell, if that was an abiblty of an av Pal i would go pal right now, or even being able to cast more than one spell in a round like 3rd attack but for spells behold the power of a warwizard then. Hey g wanna give me mana restore hehe just joking

[thulla]

oooo.....
neq, that is the best idea i have ever heard. a 2nd/3rd attack...cleric style! and as far as putting two spells on a scroll/flask there are pills and potions already in teh game that do the same thing, so why can't a cleric scribe them that way too?

also, and i think this might just be me, i think it kinda stinks that in a pk fight we aren't allowed to heal others, especially for rp reasons. i know this is a touch y subject with a few people, so ignore this if you want to. but think of it this way: you and your best friend/romantic partner is wandering down the street ic, and your nemesis wanders into the room ic and starts to attack them. why can't you help?
anyways that's my 2 cents
_________________
~*Thulla*~

[Gareth]

[Vicks]

Another solution would be to make everyone deadly

hehehe, but seriously, if you want to be able to attack people, you also have to be prepared to be attacked yourself. And if this is the case, then you should probably be playing a deadly anyway.

[Shadowkaun]

[quote="Gareth"]

[Palermo]

I'm against peacefuls going deadly all together. If you wanted to be deadly, create a deadly to begin with. A few people create peacefuls, qp them up and go deadly and act like they're tough shit while everyone else creates a deadly and deals with the crap that comes with it. If you want to play a deadly... play it from the beginning.

My four cents.

[Gareth]

[Nightblade]

As long as a note or flag is placed on the character going deadly for that reason, I'm ok with the idea. It would be a bit lame to do that, then ask an unknowing admin to change back to peaceful. Or I guess you could just entirely kill the option of switching peaceful to deadly and vice versa.
_________________
"Eye level for a kender is door-lock height for the same reason a chipmunk has extra cheek space."

"A kender will take anything that's not nailed down, and a kender with a good claw hammer will get those things too"

[Gareth]

Having thought it through, I've decided to side with Vicks and Palermo on this one - if you want to be involved in Player versus Player combat, go deadly.
Personally I view 'deadly' as the default state for a properly roleplayed character, with 'peaceful' as the intrusive game mechanic to make the game 'softer' for those who prefer to pick and choose when they get into combat. By that I mean, peaceful is a limitation you've voluntarily taken upon yourself, with all that it entails.
So sorry Thulla - you can't have it both ways. You're either in or you're out.

[Gareth]

Here's anothing that's sprung up from a recent conversation:
How about we make Peacefuls pkillable?
Now, before anyone panics, here'd be a (possible) detail:

- Pkill timer is 24 hours (you can't be pkilled more than once a day)
- No looting - this would be enforced in the code so it'd be physically impossible to get looted
- No shoving or dragging (but they can't shove or drag either)

And if you're deadly, no more loot limits, at all, or any of the other sissy complaints I keep getting

[Palermo]

Sounds fantastic!

[Lucifer]

proper mountable mobs which you can ride into battle with an uber lance.